Search for Indicators
Mental Health Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide
Value
Compared to:
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide State: Florida
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide State: Florida
8.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 42 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide County: Hillsborough
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide County: Hillsborough
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
FL Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide County: Pasco
High School Students Who Attempted Suicide County: Pasco
11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
FL Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Mental Health Provider Rate State: Florida
Mental Health Provider Rate State: Florida
206
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Prior Value
(195)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Hillsborough
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Hillsborough
224
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
FL Value
(206)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(210)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Pasco
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Pasco
106
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
FL Value
(206)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(98)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Pinellas
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Pinellas
267
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
FL Value
(206)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(250)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Polk
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Polk
120
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
FL Value
(206)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(114)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty State: Florida
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty State: Florida
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Hillsborough
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Hillsborough
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Pasco
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Pasco
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Pinellas
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Pinellas
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Polk
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Polk
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Alturas
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Alturas
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Apollo Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Apollo Beach
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Aripeka
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Aripeka
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Auburndale
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Auburndale
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Babson Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Babson Park
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Balm
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Balm
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bardmoor
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bardmoor
9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bartow
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bartow
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bay Pines
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bay Pines
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bayonet Point
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bayonet Point
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Beacon Square
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Beacon Square
9.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bear Creek
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bear Creek
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Beach
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Bluffs
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Bluffs
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Shore
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Belleair Shore
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bloomingdale
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bloomingdale
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bradley Junction
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Bradley Junction
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Brandon
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Brandon
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Carrollwood
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Carrollwood
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cheval
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cheval
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Citrus Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Citrus Park
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Clearwater
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Clearwater
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Combee Settlement
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Combee Settlement
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Connerton
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Connerton
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crooked Lake Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crooked Lake Park
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crystal Lake
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crystal Lake
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crystal Springs
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Crystal Springs
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cypress Gardens
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cypress Gardens
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dade City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dade City
16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dade City North
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dade City North
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Davenport
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Davenport
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dover
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dover
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dundee
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dundee
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dunedin
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Dunedin
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Eagle Lake
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Eagle Lake
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: East Lake
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: East Lake
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: East Lake-Orient Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: East Lake-Orient Park
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Egypt Lake-Leto
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Egypt Lake-Leto
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Elfers
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Elfers
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Feather Sound
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Feather Sound
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fish Hawk
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fish Hawk
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fort Meade
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fort Meade
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Four Corners
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Four Corners
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Frostproof
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Frostproof
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fuller Heights
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fuller Heights
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fussels Corner
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fussels Corner
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Gibsonton
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Gibsonton
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Greenbriar
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Greenbriar
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Grenelefe
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Grenelefe
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Gulfport
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Gulfport
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Haines City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Haines City
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Harbor Bluffs
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Harbor Bluffs
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Heritage Pines
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Heritage Pines
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Highland City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Highland City
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Highland Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Highland Park
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hillcrest Heights
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hillcrest Heights
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Holiday
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Holiday
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Homeland
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Homeland
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hudson
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hudson
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Indian Rocks Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Indian Rocks Beach
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Indian Shores
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Indian Shores
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Inwood
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Inwood
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Jan Phyl Village
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Jan Phyl Village
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Jasmine Estates
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Jasmine Estates
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Kathleen
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Kathleen
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Kenneth City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Kenneth City
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Key Vista
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Key Vista
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Keystone
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Keystone
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lacoochee
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lacoochee
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Alfred
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Alfred
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Hamilton
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Hamilton
10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Magdalene
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Magdalene
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Wales
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lake Wales
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lakeland
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lakeland
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lakeland Highlands
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lakeland Highlands
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Land O' Lakes
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Land O' Lakes
6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Largo
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Largo
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lealman
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lealman
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Loughman
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Loughman
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lutz
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Lutz
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Madeira Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Madeira Beach
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mango
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mango
9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Meadow Oaks
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Meadow Oaks
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Medulla
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Medulla
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Moon Lake
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Moon Lake
14.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mulberry
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mulberry
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: New Port Richey
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: New Port Richey
9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: New Port Richey East
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: New Port Richey East
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: North Redington Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: North Redington Beach
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Northdale
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Northdale
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Odessa
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Odessa
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Oldsmar
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Oldsmar
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Palm Harbor
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Palm Harbor
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Palm River-Clair Mel
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Palm River-Clair Mel
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pasadena Hills
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pasadena Hills
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pebble Creek
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pebble Creek
3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pinellas Park
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Pinellas Park
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Plant City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Plant City
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Poinciana
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Poinciana
7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Polk City
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Polk City
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Port Richey
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Port Richey
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Progress Village
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Progress Village
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Quail Ridge
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Quail Ridge
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redington Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redington Beach
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redington Shores
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redington Shores
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ridgecrest
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ridgecrest
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: River Ridge
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: River Ridge
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Riverview
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Riverview
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ruskin
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ruskin
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Safety Harbor
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Safety Harbor
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: San Antonio
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: San Antonio
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Seffner
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Seffner
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Seminole
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Seminole
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Shady Hills
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Shady Hills
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: South Highpoint
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: South Highpoint
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: South Pasadena
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: South Pasadena
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Leo
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Leo
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Pete Beach
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Pete Beach
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Petersburg
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: St. Petersburg
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Sun City Center
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Sun City Center
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tampa
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tampa
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tarpon Springs
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tarpon Springs
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Temple Terrace
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Temple Terrace
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Thonotosassa
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Thonotosassa
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tierra Verde
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Tierra Verde
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Town 'n' Country
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Town 'n' Country
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Treasure Island
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Treasure Island
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Trilby
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Trilby
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Trinity
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Trinity
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: University
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: University
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Valrico
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Valrico
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Wahneta
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Wahneta
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Waverly
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Waverly
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Polk, FL County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Polk County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Wesley Chapel
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Wesley Chapel
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pasco, FL County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Pasco County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: West Lealman
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: West Lealman
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Pinellas, FL County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Pinellas County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Westchase
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Westchase
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Hillsborough, FL County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hillsborough County value.
FL Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
